![Unemployed](http://data.neets.net/avatars/m/0/119.jpg?1710772080)
Unemployed
McMahonist
- Nov 28, 2020
- 5,413
The dumbest rule on this site imho is the rule against bumping old inactive threads.
The site even encourages us to read old threads by showing similar old threads that nobody has replied to for a loong time (how I find old threads in the first place lmao)![Stick out tongue :p :p]()
Why does the age even matter? There's no need to create a new thread if there already exists a thread that has some relevancy to what I'm about to say.
Stop enforcing this rule, and remove it from the rule book, ok?![Feelsstudy :feelsstudy: :feelsstudy:]()
@Haruhi Suzumiya @Alexanderr @Cerberus @Master
The site even encourages us to read old threads by showing similar old threads that nobody has replied to for a loong time (how I find old threads in the first place lmao)
Why does the age even matter? There's no need to create a new thread if there already exists a thread that has some relevancy to what I'm about to say.
Stop enforcing this rule, and remove it from the rule book, ok?
@Haruhi Suzumiya @Alexanderr @Cerberus @Master