Venting Why Many Men Pay For Nudes on Onlyfans

Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
1,519
Us modern people take many things for granted. One of them is photography. It was only about 200 years ago that the first photograph was taken, and the moment lost its uniqueness. All us of were born into some form of photography, thus we can't exactly picture how people would think or feel before the photography was possible. When I first realized this, it did baffle me a bit, before photography, you'd need to travel the world to see a piece of art, or a beautiful natural scenery. Now it is all at the tip of our finger. It might seem like a blessing in the first glance, but what it truly did was to strip the moment of its true value. I'll make another thread about that some other day.

Neither or brains, or our societies were could adapt to the alterations the photography would bring. Perhaps what took the biggest hit was male sexuality. To obtain a nude picture of a female in his brain, the male would either convince or force the female, or he'd need to peek. Either way, it required a decent bit of effort, just to get a glance of a nude female body. With the photography, first, the nude pictures were distributed, on magazines, or on various forms of pornography, making the sight far easier to achieve, removing the need for female interaction for the male. Then with the internet, the material became so common, and so easy to reach, it only takes a few miliseconds to obtain thousands of videos and pictures of naked bodies, and all kinds of sexual intercourse.

At first, one thinks, this will definitely lead to devaluation of the female nudity. If men have access to seeminly infinite number of female nudes, why would he even try to obtain them any other way (I am not taking physical contact with a female in consideration here, as that's an entirely different need) This line of thinking is what leads many man I've seen to say, ''I don't understand why anyone would pay for some random girls nudes, when I google big boob I get millions of results''.

The truth is, the overabundance of the female nudes on the net made ''nudes with no context'' completely meaningless, however, it also made ''nudes of a certain girl'' or ''nudes that I have spent money/effort to obtain'' far, far more valuable. Think of it like this, you can obtain the picture of Mona Lisa, at any device with a display, provided that you have an internet connection. However, that does not increase the value your device holds, since it is just ''another picture of Mona Lisa'' with no meaning or context whatsoever. Also, the fact that you can observe Mona Lisa any time you'd like, reduced nothing from the estimated financial value of the painting. If anything, it made it even more precious, now that more people have seen it. You can think of the Mona Lisa on the internet as the endless sea of pornographic material, and the real Mona Lisa as the nude obtained from a girl directly, or from Onlyfans.

Combining the natural sexual power a female holds, digital photography and a free market spells disaster for any society. This might lead us to a temporary state from hell, where majority of women don't work, instead they just sell their nudes to millions of sex starved men, wheras those man work their fingers to the bones and spend their hard obtained money on obtanining female nudes, just to stimulate the excitement of sexual success. Only top 5% of men would have direct access to the female body, prostution would be outlawed, and physical contact would be a myth for the lower class males. Seems unrealistic, perhaps it is an exaggeration, but what is undeniable is, we certainly are headed for somewhere similar. Also I'd like to add, the true effect of Onlyfans on sexual economics does require it's own thread. A lot can be said about the issue.

What are your thoughts about this subject?
 
L

liazi

Banned
Nov 26, 2020
179
From what I know some OF account offer tailored messaging and sometimes video/pics just for you, it adds even more depth than "just" picture of "one girl in particular" which is already big.
There is also the fact that the barrier between "fake" and "real" is even thinner with OF, especially with streamers with an OF. With "classic" porn it's an actress, it's far away and it's all fake. With OF it's fake, but less, way less.
I think just a few women can make a living out of OF, but those who can can potentially make good money. Bit like youtube/twitch, a few make a lot of money, some make enough, lots make nothing or close to nothing.

Men are the main culprits for this, the platform I think was created by men, probably run by them, and most of the audience has to be male.

I'm not sure this is an issue for anyone, I'm on the fence about the causality between a more promiscuous lifestyle and OF and the amount of celibate.
I think times have changed, and the past was not "better", just different.

I see the issue of being judged on your face/body for a job a bigger threat, but I don't know how "bad" it is.

What I don't understand about OF/twitch boobie streamers, is who is paying for it, how can they afford it, what is their mindset.

I'm interested in knowing what these girls think, what these guys think, and how it will turn out.
I'm also very intrigued by the whole dynamics of "more power qween" and the fact that your life can be ruined by it in some places.

To me the biggest interrogation is what is the faith of the word "whore", will it stay "bad", will it become a "good" or at least "normal" thing, and what does it entail for society.

But tbh this thread is more suited for .co than here, but then I don't know what this forum will be about really.
 
dreadtheblackpill

dreadtheblackpill

the supreme youngcel gentleman
Nov 26, 2020
410
its free why pay lmao
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
1,519
From what I know some OF account offer tailored messaging and sometimes video/pics just for you, it adds even more depth than "just" picture of "one girl in particular" which is already big.
There is also the fact that the barrier between "fake" and "real" is even thinner with OF, especially with streamers with an OF. With "classic" porn it's an actress, it's far away and it's all fake. With OF it's fake, but less, way less.
That's true. The main idea is to create personalization of porn, which can be incredibly dangerous if widespread. Men will end up not knowing female touch, that seem to be the goal of this grand scheme.
I think just a few women can make a living out of OF, but those who can can potentially make good money. Bit like youtube/twitch, a few make a lot of money, some make enough, lots make nothing or close to nothing.
It is a ''star themed'' profession after all. Like singers, or actors, there's only room for few of them. However even if they don't make a living, they'll be influenced with the fact that, they could be making far more just by selling their nudes, compared to a normal job. Presenting this opportunity alone is enough.
What I don't understand about OF/twitch boobie streamers, is who is paying for it, how can they afford it, what is their mindset.
There are tons of men, in the US and Europe, who do not even have to confidence, or the manhood to hire a prostitute. For them, internet provides a sense of security in that aspect, as they don't have to show their faces. The excitement of female approval, as close as they can get to the feeling of sexual success, and being a man, they pay to reach that.
To me the biggest interrogation is what is the faith of the word "whore", will it stay "bad", will it become a "good" or at least "normal" thing, and what does it entail for society.
They have been trying to normalize it for a long time, but I doubt they could be completely successful. There's something innate about the cleanness of a woman, something divine almost, and it cannot be removed regardless of the potency of the propaganda.
 
L

liazi

Banned
Nov 26, 2020
179
They have been trying to normalize it for a long time, but I doubt they could be completely successful. There's something innate about the cleanness of a woman, something divine almost, and it cannot be removed regardless of the potency of the propaganda.
What we have to keep in mind it's that there are what "we" think and what "they" think.
If all women start to think "I'm not a whore" or "whore is not a bad term", then it will be in conflict with what men think. And if more and more men think "whore is not bad", the morality will shift.
I don't know how fast this could happen, I know that the notion of "slut" has already lost lots of ground.

Myself I can't decide what I think is morally "right" and "wrong".

I believe in the blackpill, but I'm starting to wonder how "voluntary" and how "aware" people are of it.
I have been gaslighted by a chad and a stacy, but until then it had been so "subtle".

I'm a sheeple and easily influenced, if the majority of society start to accept "whores" as a normal thing and not bad anymore I might more or less accept it.
I try to make up my own mind, but some things are too "big" for me, and I may be arrogant at times, I'm not arrogant enough to believe "I" have the sole right vision and not the majority of society. Also, sometimes you have to accept what they think.

One thing that "bothers" me is that lots of slutshaming/bad aspect of "whores" are pushed by religions and societies/cultures heavily influenced by religions, and I don't like religions at all.
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
1,519
What we have to keep in mind it's that there are what "we" think and what "they" think.
If all women start to think "I'm not a whore" or "whore is not a bad term", then it will be in conflict with what men think. And if more and more men think "whore is not bad", the morality will shift.
I don't know how fast this could happen, I know that the notion of "slut" has already lost lots of ground.

Myself I can't decide what I think is morally "right" and "wrong".

I believe in the blackpill, but I'm starting to wonder how "voluntary" and how "aware" people are of it.
I have been gaslighted by a chad and a stacy, but until then it had been so "subtle".

I'm a sheeple and easily influenced, if the majority of society start to accept "whores" as a normal thing and not bad anymore I might more or less accept it.
I try to make up my own mind, but some things are too "big" for me, and I may be arrogant at times, I'm not arrogant enough to believe "I" have the sole right vision and not the majority of society. Also, sometimes you have to accept what they think.

One thing that "bothers" me is that lots of slutshaming/bad aspect of "whores" are pushed by religions and societies/cultures heavily influenced by religions, and I don't like religions at all.
I don't agree with you in certain points.

The entire idea of a society based on individual families is, one man dedicated himself to one woman, and one woman dedicates herself to a man. Together, they'd produce offspring, which would again, follow the steps of his/her parents. This is the basic model for traditional, Christian family, that went on to influence every living part of the world. Civil Laws in many countries were based on this model, modern law was based on this model, for a reason. It provides stability and sustainability in the society, and in provides fair opportunities for the individuals.

Without this model, the powerful males would gather up all the women they could, women would happily obey, as they'd get to be with a strong male, and the weak, powerless males would remain all alone. This was the accepted social behavior, prior to spread of the said family model. It is also the reason why for every 17 women that got to reproduce through history, one male did. With no set of rules, either provided by the state, by religion or by the society, we would go back to those days, eventually.

Now on slut shaming. Remember that we have used an unnatural model, the traditional family model, to fight off the unfairness the natural model would bring. Slut shaming is plausible, because sluts themselves are working against that traditional family model our societies rely on deeply. They give in to their desires, and exercise a form of degeneracy that could destroy even the greatest civilizations with enough time. There was a good reason sluts were stoned back in the day. People subconsciously knew, that if they were to let sluts thrieve, their days as a culture would be over. First, men would be driven away from their families, women would be left without the guidance of men, so more and more of them would turn into sluts. And then as families crumble, due to the demand inequality between women and men, women would gain power, men would be miserable and pathetic. If you see a slut, always remember that, she's not just an enemy of a certain group, she's an enemy of the whole humanity, and everything that stands for it.

What I mean is, we don't get to say the morality is whoredom is subjective, as us, and everything we know, we built, stands against it. It's not just some random issue that stands in the middle of nowhere. Without families, there's no human civilization as we know it today. And personally, that's why I hate sluts so much. They are the enemy of art, philosophy, or anything remarkable, really.

To make people think that the morality of slut shaming was even debateable, first you'd need to make people doubt their own identities. It is a massive slippery slope that leads to nothing but destruction.

On religion, it's too deep of an issue for me to properly discuss with a few words, but I'll say this: a successful religion has to offer a stable model for society, otherwise it would have been forgotten long time ago. You shouldn't think of it as in, religion is against sluttery, that's why people think it is bad, but rather, religion layed the foundation of the human society, and even though I am against the religion itself, I'll accept the rules and ideas religion offers, as it has provided us with stable societies for hundreds of years.

This is all my opinion, obviously.
 
Blackguard

Blackguard

~ELITE-NEET~
Nov 26, 2020
539
There was actually a horrible story of a guy who killed his family.
Why.....
Because he was basically a balding incel, who was giving a Camgirl in Bulgaria over $100,000!
He said it was a "relationship", because she give him special pics. No Joke, its all real!!!
 
G

Guest

Guest
There was actually a horrible story of a guy who killed his family.
Why.....
Because he was basically a balding incel, who was giving a Camgirl in Bulgaria over $100,000!
He said it was a "relationship", because she give him special pics. No Joke, its all real!!!

Jesus fucking Christ :feelsohgod:
 
Eren

Eren

‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏‎ ‏‏
Nov 28, 2020
2,662
High iq analysis
 
Aedra

Aedra

Funeral Attendant
Nov 26, 2020
1,369
There was actually a horrible story of a guy who killed his family.
Why.....
Because he was basically a balding incel, who was giving a Camgirl in Bulgaria over $100,000!
He said it was a "relationship", because she give him special pics. No Joke, its all real!!!

Jesus Christ.
 
L

liazi

Banned
Nov 26, 2020
179
One other aspect to take into account now is that the pandora box has been opened, foids won't go back to force monogamy just for the sake of society.
 
chudur-budur

chudur-budur

5'2" ugliest currycel, freak of nature
Nov 26, 2020
2,385
There was actually a horrible story of a guy who killed his family.
Why.....
Because he was basically a balding incel, who was giving a Camgirl in Bulgaria over $100,000!
He said it was a "relationship", because she give him special pics. No Joke, its all real!!!


Lmfao freaking bald-cuckcel hahahahahaha lololololol ..... :feelslol::feelslol::feelslol::feelslol::feelslol::feelslol:
 
K

KingofLDAR

NEET
Nov 27, 2020
68
You can think of the Mona Lisa on the internet as the endless sea of pornographic material, and the real Mona Lisa as the nude obtained from a girl directly, or from Onlyfans.
the difference is the Mona Lisa has value but these whores on only fans are all trashy whores. Any man who pays for this is a pathetic simp who elevates some whore on Onlyfans to being "above" a normal whore, when in reality she is worse.

It's different than prostitution btw, because sex isn't free in the same way that nudes are, so paying for a service that isn't usually free is not simping in the same way paying for OnlyFans is.
 
Sorcerer

Sorcerer

North-Atlantid Slayer. 6.5 inch dick. Blue-Eyes #1
Dec 9, 2020
1,169
Us modern people take many things for granted. One of them is photography. It was only about 200 years ago that the first photograph was taken, and the moment lost its uniqueness. All us of were born into some form of photography, thus we can't exactly picture how people would think or feel before the photography was possible. When I first realized this, it did baffle me a bit, before photography, you'd need to travel the world to see a piece of art, or a beautiful natural scenery. Now it is all at the tip of our finger. It might seem like a blessing in the first glance, but what it truly did was to strip the moment of its true value. I'll make another thread about that some other day.

Neither or brains, or our societies were could adapt to the alterations the photography would bring. Perhaps what took the biggest hit was male sexuality. To obtain a nude picture of a female in his brain, the male would either convince or force the female, or he'd need to peek. Either way, it required a decent bit of effort, just to get a glance of a nude female body. With the photography, first, the nude pictures were distributed, on magazines, or on various forms of pornography, making the sight far easier to achieve, removing the need for female interaction for the male. Then with the internet, the material became so common, and so easy to reach, it only takes a few miliseconds to obtain thousands of videos and pictures of naked bodies, and all kinds of sexual intercourse.

At first, one thinks, this will definitely lead to devaluation of the female nudity. If men have access to seeminly infinite number of female nudes, why would he even try to obtain them any other way (I am not taking physical contact with a female in consideration here, as that's an entirely different need) This line of thinking is what leads many man I've seen to say, ''I don't understand why anyone would pay for some random girls nudes, when I google big boob I get millions of results''.

The truth is, the overabundance of the female nudes on the net made ''nudes with no context'' completely meaningless, however, it also made ''nudes of a certain girl'' or ''nudes that I have spent money/effort to obtain'' far, far more valuable. Think of it like this, you can obtain the picture of Mona Lisa, at any device with a display, provided that you have an internet connection. However, that does not increase the value your device holds, since it is just ''another picture of Mona Lisa'' with no meaning or context whatsoever. Also, the fact that you can observe Mona Lisa any time you'd like, reduced nothing from the estimated financial value of the painting. If anything, it made it even more precious, now that more people have seen it. You can think of the Mona Lisa on the internet as the endless sea of pornographic material, and the real Mona Lisa as the nude obtained from a girl directly, or from Onlyfans.

Combining the natural sexual power a female holds, digital photography and a free market spells disaster for any society. This might lead us to a temporary state from hell, where majority of women don't work, instead they just sell their nudes to millions of sex starved men, wheras those man work their fingers to the bones and spend their hard obtained money on obtanining female nudes, just to stimulate the excitement of sexual success. Only top 5% of men would have direct access to the female body, prostution would be outlawed, and physical contact would be a myth for the lower class males. Seems unrealistic, perhaps it is an exaggeration, but what is undeniable is, we certainly are headed for somewhere similar. Also I'd like to add, the true effect of Onlyfans on sexual economics does require it's own thread. A lot can be said about the issue.

What are your thoughts about this subject?
Why Many Men Pay For @Aedracel Nudes On OnlyFans
2418249-1334121583.png

todd-howard-hey-speaking-of-beasts-have-you-heard-about-34179134.png
 
S

saber

Banned
Dec 13, 2020
837
There was actually a horrible story of a guy who killed his family.
Why.....
Because he was basically a balding incel, who was giving a Camgirl in Bulgaria over $100,000!
He said it was a "relationship", because she give him special pics.

literal succubus
 
incelkingkong

incelkingkong

incel battle royale
Nov 28, 2020
3,048
If you see a slut, always remember that, she's not just an enemy of a certain group, she's an enemy of the whole humanity, and everything that stands for it.
 
Aedra

Aedra

Funeral Attendant
Nov 26, 2020
1,369
If you see a slut, always remember that, she's not just an enemy of a certain group, she's an enemy of the whole humanity, and everything that stands for it.
I feel like I've read this before but can't exactly tell when I've read it ngl.
 
Atila

Atila

GFYS
Dec 2, 2020
14,199
i think those desperate cucks and simps think of it as some tye of relation with the whore
 
H

HikiNEET

NEET
Dec 18, 2020
22
I personally don't (literally) see any women irl or even in social media (I don't have any) so I wouldn't have a reason to lust for their nudes.

But if I was a normie and was attracted to a woman, even then I wouldn't pay for their nudes on OF. I think their nudes being there would kill all the attraction for me.

Also I doubt anyone except the top 5-10% even makes any significant income from it. There are not enough simps to go around. And browsing some stats confirms it: Average OF account makes about 250$/month and median 180$/month (tips are not counted, but they should disproportionately go for top accounts too). Having detailed stats would be nice, but given I don't give effort to search for them, this should suffice. Only top 1% does make tens of thousands monthly.

Women are making themselves whores to earn a pittance. It works out if you have no shame. But for social creatures that women are, the reward is too low. This is not some hidden nudes. If you want to get more subscribers on OF, you need to broadcast to everyone, that you have one.

Top accounts are likely to earn big money, but a lot of them are celebrities and pornstars. I see a lot of porn regulars have OF account (the free nudes I find from internet have OF advertisement link).

Only ones who wins from OF is the top company itself (pimp takes 20% cut) and some pornstars/celebrities.

Edit: As a caveat, OF is growing, since more simps are joining, but that sould be balanced by more women joining to fight for those bux.

To get it, I scraped the Onlyfans website and did some analysis. The results are presented below for your pleasure. At the very bottom, I explain how I got them.


To start I go through OnlyFans as a business, explaining why I think it is a unicorn in disguise. Next, we’ll look at how OnlyFans is more unequal than the least equal country in the world. Finally, I’ll return to the question I began this essay with. Should you make an OnlyFans account? -
In 2019, they had over 60,000 content creators and 7m registered users. Extrapolating from the Google growth trends, it’s safe to say they have at least 10m users today. I calculated the average revenue per creator per month (about $250) and the average subscription fee (about $8.7) from my scraped data. Applying the 20% commission and assuming only half the users and creators are active, we end up with a lower bound of $90m, and an upper bound of $104m.
The revenue of content creators follows a classic power law distribution. The top accounts make something like $100,000 a month (these aren’t in my sample). The median account makes $180 a month.

The top 1% of accounts make 33% of all the money.
The top 10% of accounts make 73% of all the money. This isn’t the 80:20 rule; it’s the 80:14 rule.
 
Last edited:
Sorcerer

Sorcerer

North-Atlantid Slayer. 6.5 inch dick. Blue-Eyes #1
Dec 9, 2020
1,169
I always play as a Nord in Skyrim tbh, though I don't pick any sides in the civil war.
This is the Nord you play:
3769d7c6264a4f590edea5a3ea3fc98d--elder-scrolls-skyrim.jpg

@incelkingkong I see a slut that looks just like you:
ryuko-photo-u1
 
Saito

Saito

NEET
Sep 19, 2021
2,175
TLDR but I can't understand why when there's literally millions of pics of nude bitches online FOR FREE! Fucking retards. Only way I would buy some bitches onlyfans is if I know/knew her irl and wanted to see them nude otherwise fuck off.
 
Asylum Patient

Asylum Patient

I wish I was Dutch
May 13, 2021
2,015
Not angry and depressed enough? I got another "fun fact" for you.
The founder & CEO of the cultural cancer that is Onlyfans is actually a british Chad with a net worth of around $120-150 million.
tim-stokely.jpg
NINTCHDBPICT000656184979.jpg


Motherfucker owns a gated multimillion dollar mansion and is living his life the the fullest while we all rot. I hate this world so much.:clown::clown:
 
mortyposter

mortyposter

NEET
Oct 31, 2021
143
I'd pay for the nudes because the girls are sexy.
 
Unemployed

Unemployed

🥇
Nov 28, 2020
1,135
TLDR but I can't understand why when there's literally millions of pics of nude bitches online FOR FREE! Fucking retards. Only way I would buy some bitches onlyfans is if I know/knew her irl and wanted to see them nude otherwise fuck off.
ur just mad cuz noone would buy your pics lmao hater :feelsjuice:
 
Top