maharsha
NEET
- Jun 26, 2021
- 547
mentioned even once. Simply astonishing. The piece is an interview with a leftist female behavior geneticist who can't quite enjoy cocktail parties because she, unlike her commie and progressive associates, believes that genetics matters (not that she's less committed to "social justice" than they are; she just happens to like the support genetics supposedly lends to redistributive and other schemes). Obviously she doesn't care about ugly men and their woes, but given the issue under consideration, the least she could have done is briefly acknowledge their existence and plight.
Can Progressives Be Convinced That Genetics Matters? | The New Yorker
Can Progressives Be Convinced That Genetics Matters? | The New Yorker