Venting Sex should be criminalised

[monocholic]

title

 

[Fimbultyr]

Counter-thesis:
Nothing should be criminalised.

 

[FullTimeRotter]

Seethe, incel.

 

[Fabio]

Counter-thesis:
Nothing should be criminalised.

Unsustainable

 

[Muri]

you say it probably because you cant get laid

 

[bitcoin]

Agreed

 

[Fimbultyr]

Unsustainable

Cope of a state-slave.
We, as a human collective, simply need to go back into resonance with the love of the universe.
I love you too Fabio-Chan, -on a metaphysical-level of course.

 

[Fabio]

Cope of a state-slave.
We, as a human collective, simply need to go back into resonance with the love of the universe.
I love you too Fabio-Chan, -on a metaphysical-level of course.

Uga-buga caveman cope

 

[Fimbultyr]

Uga-buga caveman cope

Cavemans are based

 

[monocholic]

you say it probably because you cant get laid

i don't want to get laid. sex is gross!!!

 

[Straizer]

i don't want to get laid. sex is gross!!!

what is gross in putting your juicy meat lump in another meat hole full of weird juices and maybe other little creatures?

 

[patientfrog]

Counter-thesis:
Nothing should be criminalised.

even slicing your head off with a machete? sorry to be blunt, but this is what you're asking to be decriminalized

 

[Fimbultyr]

even slicing your head off with a machete? sorry to be blunt, but this is what you're asking to be decriminalized

Yes.
If we look at ancient Germanic societies we can see that their were no laws and therefore no criminals.
What you could do and do not was regulated by an honorary-codex and those who worked against it where either banned from society, or neutralized truth self-defense, in some rare cases truth duels, or clan feuds (which resulted in some form of compensation.

There is no need for laws, if you can build a society again which works as a facility for collective survival.
In our modern times, people inside the same society are working against each other and not with each other, as it is meant originally.
There lies the problem and forcing laws on people is just an degenerative symptom of it.

 

[Fabio]

Yes.
If we look at ancient Germanic societies we can see that their were no laws and therefore no criminals.
What you could do and do not was regulated by an honorary-codex and those who worked against it where either banned from society, or neutralized truth self-defense, in some rare cases truth duels, or clan feuds (which resulted in some form of compensation.

There is no need for laws, if you can build a society again which works as a facility for collective survival.
In our modern times, people inside the same society are working against each other and not with each other, as it is meant originally.
There lies the problem and forcing laws on people is just an degenerative symptom of it.

If these "based" ancient germanic societies were so good why did they migrate en masse into cringe bureaucratic roman lands?

 

[Fimbultyr]

If these "based" ancient germanic societies were so good why did they migrate en masse into cringe bureaucratic roman lands?

The history of the Germanic tribes is also a history of migrations. The way of life of the Germanic tribes did not allow them to live together in a small area like the Romans or Celts.
To protect their way of life, they had to migrate again and again to all parts of the world. In the end, this even brought them as far as India and North Africa.
Of course, this is only a slowing down of a process that, in a world of decay, can never be completely stopped.

 

[NeverEndingWinter]

Every woman that doesn't suck my dick should be fined $30k by the government

 

[patientfrog]

Yes.
If we look at ancient Germanic societies we can see that their were no laws and therefore no criminals.
What you could do and do not was regulated by an honorary-codex and those who worked against it where either banned from society, or neutralized truth self-defense, in some rare cases truth duels, or clan feuds (which resulted in some form of compensation.

There is no need for laws, if you can build a society again which works as a facility for collective survival.
In our modern times, people inside the same society are working against each other and not with each other, as it is meant originally.
There lies the problem and forcing laws on people is just an degenerative symptom of it.

well, prisoners are de facto banned from society. duels i could live with and there may be some benefit to it.

what's the real difference between a code and a law? doesn't seem to be any meaningful difference between the two. also, what's the difference between forcing laws on people and forcing a code of conduct? again, doesn't seem to be substantial difference.

what laws in particular don't you like? what laws that we currently have don't you agree with?

 

[Atila]

What 0 pussy does to a mfer

 

[Fabio]

Every woman that doesn't suck my dick should be fined $30k by the government

Imagine the revenue government could get from these fines. Go and pitch that idea at house of commons.

 

[Fimbultyr]

well, prisoners are de facto banned from society.

No they aren't banned from society. Society still feeds them and so they are still a part of it.

what's the real difference between a code and a law? doesn't seem to be any meaningful difference between the two.

A code in Germanic sense is enforced by the small community that the problem took place in.
- The power is still in the hands of the people themselves.

A law may come into force without the consent of society. A law is something that is dictated from above and thus does not grow organically from the people. And so a law needs to be enforced by some kind of law-enforcement/state.
- The power doesn't lie within the people anymore.

also, what's the difference between forcing laws on people and forcing a code of conduct? again, doesn't seem to be substantial difference.

Laws are getting forced, a code of conduct usually grows organically out of the, for example, tribe.
-Laws do not need consent, but are getting forced on the masses.
-Codes of conduct do not work without the consent of the masses.

what laws in particular don't you like? what laws that we currently have don't you agree with?

I don't agree with any laws, as I don't agree with the concept behind it.
Everyone should be able to decide for themselves how someone behaves and then deal with the resulting consequences.