jfl

G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273

JFL Faceapp thinks Cloud Strife is a woman​

Jump to newIgnoreWatch
[IMG alt="Andros"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/l/4/4742.jpg?1619620570[/IMG]

Andros

Zephir​

JoinedJan 14, 2020Posts3,359Reputation5,340Time online49d 8h 33m
4 minutes ago
JFL at this effeminate gay alien
0 masculinity

Screenshot_20210429-123128~2.png


Two FF prettyboy combined is a female abomination

FaceApp_1619685097420.jpg


This is what happens when you combine two GigaChads

FaceApp_1619685225276.jpg
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
@Looksmax Refugee I was right about Japanese characters being extremely effeminate
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
That ''gigachad'' wouldn't be able to slay any jbs. Is it even worth it at that point? The agepill obliterated me.
you are retarded if you believe that gigachad wouldnt fog all the prettyboys.
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
you are retarded if you believe that gigachad wouldnt fog all the prettyboys.
Doesn't matter if he fogs them. In the end the prettyboys will cum in his daughter, and he'll be cucked. Yeah he looks stronger, better, so what? He's the cuck in the end. He has to suck on some 40 something years old saggy ass tits, whereas the prettyboys will enjoy creamy prime pussy. Who's the winner again? That's right.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
Doesn't matter if he fogs them. In the end the prettyboys will cum in his daughter, and he'll be cucked. Yeah he looks stronger, better, so what? He's the cuck in the end. He has to suck on some 40 something years old saggy ass tits, whereas the prettyboys will enjoy creamy prime pussy. Who's the winner again? That's right.
lol no.

Women DREAM of cheating with badboymaxxed douchebags running RTT game NOT prettyboy twinks with ZERO SEX APPEAL. They prefer guys that are facially attractive for LTR because they can show off to their friends, etc. but if you are after ONS and hookups RTT is the best strategy. Studies show that girls want masculine guys for hookups and pretty boys for relationships.

Just like we as guys would fuck a pornstar looking girl for a ONS but wouldn't want her as an LTR, girls want ONS with sexappealmaxxed guys aka the gigachad in OP
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
Women DREAM of cheating with badboymaxxed douchebags running RTT game NOT prettyboy twinks with ZERO SEX APPEAL. They prefer guys that are facially attractive for LTR because they can show off to their friends, etc. but if you are after ONS and hookups RTT is the best strategy. Studies show that girls want masculine guys for hookups and pretty boys for relationships.

Just like we as guys would fuck a pornstar looking girl for a ONS but wouldn't want her as an LTR, girls want ONS with sexappealmaxxed guys aka the gigachad in OP
Speak for youself on the pornstar looking girl, most men find them disgusting, including me.
That gigachad has wrinkles, gray hairs, his skin is starting to look old. His youth is abandoning him. Some women will find him more attractive, sure, like that 33 years old unmarried office lady with a pussy size of a swimming pool. If you're into that, sure I guess, looking masculine pays off.
Who would have more sex with, say, 19 years old college students? A pretty boy or some masc looking guy that looks like he could be her father?
The studies don't take in the age of the women, obviously older women will find the gigachad more attractive. But you're missing the point. Who the fuck wants that? Who'd prefer 35 years old pussy over 18 years old pussy? Only some sick fucks, that's it.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
Speak for youself on the pornstar looking girl, most men find them disgusting, including me.
That gigachad has wrinkles, gray hairs, his skin is starting to look old. His youth is abandoning him. Some women will find him more attractive, sure, like that 33 years old unmarried office lady with a pussy size of a swimming pool. If you're into that, sure I guess, looking masculine pays off.
Who would have more sex with, say, 19 years old college students? A pretty boy or some masc looking guy that looks like he could be her father?
The studies don't take in the age of the women, obviously older women will find the gigachad more attractive. But you're missing the point. Who the fuck wants that? Who'd prefer 35 years old pussy over 18 years old pussy? Only some sick fucks, that's it.


I was talking about JBs in the other post btw. PSL clearly fucked your ability to think logically.

1619686972266
vs
1619686994103


attraction is all about one's ability to survive and reproduce. There are countless examples of woman who lost interest in men when they started to act low T or lost in a fight. Stop fucking coping.
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
I was talking about JBs in the other post btw. PSL clearly fucked your ability to think logically.
Link me the supposed studies where JBs prefered older masculine looking men over pretty boys their age then.
attraction is all about one's ability to survive and reproduce.
That's not true. Attraction is about looks, that's it. The looks that are found attractive are manifestations of the required traits. It's important not to mix these two. If you look masculine, but don't act the part, women will still find you more attractive, compared to the guy who acts masculine, but doesn't look the part, which is expected, since we make decisions based on how things look rather than what they do.
Ability to survive, or reproduce, rely more on intelligence, being skillful, adaptability, and those traits are without a doubt far more important than being high T. Yet they aren't desired, nor seeked after.
There are countless examples of woman who lost interest in men when they started to act low T or lost in a fight. Stop fucking coping.
I don't understand what this is even supposed to mean. Yes it's true, it can happen, but we were talking about looks. Why do you act as if a prettyboy won't display high T behavior?
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
Speak for youself on the pornstar looking girl, most men find them disgusting, including me.
That gigachad has wrinkles, gray hairs, his skin is starting to look old. His youth is abandoning him. Some women will find him more attractive, sure, like that 33 years old unmarried office lady with a pussy size of a swimming pool. If you're into that, sure I guess, looking masculine pays off.
Who would have more sex with, say, 19 years old college students? A pretty boy or some masc looking guy that looks like he could be her father?
The studies don't take in the age of the women, obviously older women will find the gigachad more attractive. But you're missing the point. Who the fuck wants that? Who'd prefer 35 years old pussy over 18 years old pussy? Only some sick fucks, that's it.
also

Some of the things you say are stupid as hell and this is one of them. The fact that some people (you) think pretty boys have more smv than a masculine guy is just a showing of how low your iq is. I also used to believe this lie until I thought about it for more than two seconds. For instance:

-Pretty boys only slay girls who are below the age of 17 or 18 at max.
-They can come off as gay and fruity to other men
- They age like shit like your god Chico and have a short shelf life

Imagine trying to run pretty boy game past the age of 20🤡.

Masculine Guys slay way more just look at this nigga:
images (96).jpeg


Man is turning 30 this year and mogs prime Chico to hell and back.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
That's not true. Attraction is about looks, that's it. The looks that are found attractive are manifestations of the required traits. It's important not to mix these two. If you look masculine, but don't act the part, women will still find you more attractive, compared to the guy who acts masculine, but doesn't look the part, which is expected, since we make decisions based on how things look rather than what they do.
Ability to survive, or reproduce, rely more on intelligence, being skillful, adaptability, and those traits are without a doubt far more important than being high T. Yet they aren't desired, nor seeked after.
you are fucking brain-dead. Looks = survival chances and reproduction = life.

Looks are so important because you can pass those characteristic to your children that will maybe inherit them, thats the core of the blackpill and how evolution works. Im done with this silly argument, you are too dumb to understand anyways.
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
also

Some of the things you say are stupid as hell and this is one of them. The fact that some people (you) think pretty boys have more smv than a masculine guy is just a showing of how low your iq is. I also used to believe this lie until I thought about it for more than two seconds. For instance:

-Pretty boys only slay girls who are below the age of 17 or 18 at max.
-They can come off as gay and fruity to other men
- They age like shit like your god Chico and have a short shelf life

Imagine trying to run pretty boy game past the age of 20🤡.

Masculine Guys slay way more just look at this nigga:
images (96).jpeg


Man is turning 30 this year and mogs prime Chico to hell and back.
Obviously they'll slay more than him, he is not a pretty boy after all. Why do you think of them as weak, small, thin men? When someone says a pretty boy, I think of this:
Nzhzuqhu44351


or

5213d837cffb1dc0812fa65bb89c4199


The ones you posted look like children.
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
Looks = survival chances and reproduction = life.
That has been true only for the last 5,000 or so years, prior to that, when the majority of brain evolution happened, those could not have been the factors, people had far bigger problems. Wars between the tribes, the cold, the diseases etc. During those times, looks did not matter nearly as much as they did now, the most important factor being, women didn't have the right to say anything. They weren't the selectors. They were never meant to be the selectors. Only the men who survived got to breed. Once the death factor was taken out, with the development of medicine, better access to food and so on, women rise to power in terms of sex, which frankly, is very recent. That's the reason of the downfall of our species. Women will now, choose to breed with men with looks, over the men with a reliable future. The average IQ will keep decreasing, until the general public is nothing but a herd of idiots. That wasn't always the case, as I stated. In fact, in many cultures, unattractive and old men were preferred partners (not preferred by the girl, but her parents), many provebs can be found on this, but I won't get into it too much.
Looks are so important because you can pass those characteristic to your children that will maybe inherit them, thats the core of the blackpill and how evolution works.
That's not true either. For looks to be important, women must have some power over the male selection. They did not, until the recent times, thus no, evolution does not work that way. This isn't true for every animal species, but for ones that live in groups, and have a settled hierarchy, this will always be the case. Take gorillas, as an example. The female doesn't get a word about the mate selection. She's just an object. The males fight, and the stronger and the smarter one takes all the females, even if the females prefer the other male. That was the case for our ancestors as well, an it still is the case on isolated human tribes.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
That has been true only for the last 5,000 or so years, prior to that, when the majority of brain evolution happened, those could not have been the factors, people had far bigger problems. Wars between the tribes, the cold, the diseases etc. During those times, looks did not matter nearly as much as they did now, the most important factor being, women didn't have the right to say anything. They weren't the selectors. They were never meant to be the selectors. Only the men who survived got to breed. Once the death factor was taken out, with the development of medicine, better access to food and so on, women rise to power in terms of sex, which frankly, is very recent. That's the reason of the downfall of our species. Women will now, choose to breed with men with looks, over the men with a reliable future. The average IQ will keep decreasing, until the general public is nothing but a herd of idiots. That wasn't always the case, as I stated. In fact, in many cultures, unattractive and old men were preferred partners (not preferred by the girl, but her parents), many provebs can be found on this, but I won't get into it too much.

That's not true either. For looks to be important, women must have some power over the male selection. They did not, until the recent times, thus no, evolution does not work that way. This isn't true for every animal species, but for ones that live in groups, and have a settled hierarchy, this will always be the case. Take gorillas, as an example. The female doesn't get a word about the mate selection. She's just an object. The males fight, and the stronger and the smarter one takes all the females, even if the females prefer the other male. That was the case for our ancestors as well, an it still is the case on isolated human tribes.
nigga no matter how many words you write it doesnt make it any smarter

genetic quality = looks = ability to reproduce with more women (even 5k years ago)

the face or looks (how you call them) is just an indicator of how good your genes are.

women only care about 3 things: resources (money now), status and looks

5k years ago all of this thing came from looks aka genetic quality. Muscles? test. Proper facial development and wide bones? mostly test and genes. Mental sanity? test.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
nigga no matter how many words you write it doesnt make it any smarter

genetic quality = looks = ability to reproduce with more women (even 5k years ago)

the face or looks (how you call them) is just an indicator of how good your genes are.

women only care about 3 things: resources (money now), status and looks

5k years ago all of this thing came from looks aka genetic quality. Muscles? test. Proper facial development and wide bones? mostly test and genes. Mental sanity? test.
actually even mental sanity comes from genes. There’s no free will, all your life is predisposed on how good your genes are
Overall he still looks masc and big
Girls lust over him so hard
Suicidefuel
still manages to sound soy jfl
 
Cope Artist

Cope Artist

Satire account
Nov 26, 2020
2,305
nigga no matter how many words you write it doesnt make it any smarter
I never claimed it did, why would it anyways? Calling me braindead doesn't make your points stronger either but that's all you've been doing.
genetic quality = looks = ability to reproduce with more women (even 5k years ago)
No, not at all. The higher social position you had, the more women you'd be able to breed with. The tribe leaders, military leaders, had far more women than men who looked good.
In the ancient times, one men, who was the leader of the tribe, had the most women. Not because he looked good, or had high testosterone like you retardedly claim, but because of his status.
In 500's, 1000's, leaders again had the most women. Take men like Genghis Khan for example, he had so many women, he has millions of descendents living today. Was it because of his physical looks, or his face? Obviously not.
Men like Attila, Timur, Vlad, Suleiman etc, had harems of women. You might think they are extreme examples, claiming that they are the exception, but don't forget that things weren't different 5k years ago. People with higher status got to breed with the most women, even if they're ugly, short, deformed etc. It was far more important than anything, main reason being, women had no power.
the face or looks (how you call them) is just an indicator of how good your genes are.
That's hilariously stupid, impressively stupid actually.
You can have a great looking face and have genetic mental disorders, tumors to take your life before your 20's, numerous genetic diseases, genetic deformities. You could have anything, with a good face. I don't know where you got that information from, but it's absolutely wrong.
women only care about 3 things: resources (money now), status and looks

5k years ago all of this thing came from looks aka genetic quality. Muscles? test. Proper facial development and wide bones? mostly test and genes. Mental sanity? test.
Again, that's impressively stupid. There are millions of factors that affect muscles, bone development, facial development and mental status. Millions. Testosterone is just one of them. I am not claiming that it's insignificant, however you can't put it in the center of everything and expect the argument to hold. It's so much more complex than that.
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
I never claimed it did, why would it anyways? Calling me braindead doesn't make your points stronger either but that's all you've been doing.

No, not at all. The higher social position you had, the more women you'd be able to breed with. The tribe leaders, military leaders, had far more women than men who looked good.
In the ancient times, one men, who was the leader of the tribe, had the most women. Not because he looked good, or had high testosterone like you retardedly claim, but because of his status.
In 500's, 1000's, leaders again had the most women. Take men like Genghis Khan for example, he had so many women, he has millions of descendents living today. Was it because of his physical looks, or his face? Obviously not.
Men like Attila, Timur, Vlad, Suleiman etc, had harems of women. You might think they are extreme examples, claiming that they are the exception, but don't forget that things weren't different 5k years ago. People with higher status got to breed with the most women, even if they're ugly, short, deformed etc. It was far more important than anything, main reason being, women had no power.

That's hilariously stupid, impressively stupid actually.
You can have a great looking face and have genetic mental disorders, tumors to take your life before your 20's, numerous genetic diseases, genetic deformities. You could have anything, with a good face. I don't know where you got that information from, but it's absolutely wrong.

Again, that's impressively stupid. There are millions of factors that affect muscles, bone development, facial development and mental status. Millions. Testosterone is just one of them. I am not claiming that it's insignificant, however you can't put it in the center of everything and expect the argument to hold. It's so much more complex than that.
Im in online class rn. Give me a break with the essays
 
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
No, not at all. The higher social position you had, the more women you'd be able to breed with. The tribe leaders, military leaders, had far more women than men who looked good.
In the ancient times, one men, who was the leader of the tribe, had the most women. Not because he looked good, or had high testosterone like you retardedly claim, but because of his status.
and where did the status come from? yes, you guessed it. Looks.
In 500's, 1000's, leaders again had the most women. Take men like Genghis Khan for example, he had so many women, he has millions of descendents living today. Was it because of his physical looks, or his face? Obviously not.
yes, genhis khan is always described as a great leader AND A HANDSOME, TALL MAN. It might not be true, but being tall and handsome is a sign of status and leadership.
That's hilariously stupid, impressively stupid actually.
You can have a great looking face and have genetic mental disorders, tumors to take your life before your 20's, numerous genetic diseases, genetic deformities. You could have anything, with a good face. I don't know where you got that information from, but it's absolutely wrong.
thats actually not entirely true + none of those are sexually passable diseases

Again, that's impressively stupid. There are millions of factors that affect muscles, bone development, facial development and mental status. Millions. Testosterone is just one of them. I am not claiming that it's insignificant, however you can't put it in the center of everything and expect the argument to hold. It's so much more complex than that.
it's the one that has the biggest influence. its not like science has figured out everything anyways
I never claimed it did, why would it anyways? Calling me braindead doesn't make your points stronger either but that's all you've been doing.
Im calling you a braindead because you are one jfl
 
Last edited:
G

GigaChad™

Banned
Feb 17, 2021
2,273
cope thread prime justin bieber had the highest smv ever
thats actually true, but its mostly because of his fame and status. Anyways, stop coping latebloomer
 
Atila

Atila

xiǎo bái liǎn / King Vamp
Dec 2, 2020
18,915
thats actually true, but its mostly because of his fame and status. Anyways, stop coping latebloomer
sure that's why foids are lining up and go grazy for ed sheeran rigtht? jfl at you
GettyImages 157939777
 
Activity
So far there's no one here

Similar threads

Chazz
Replies
11
Views
637
cozyneet
cozyneet
KARENIN
Replies
33
Views
3K
FemoidsGTFO
FemoidsGTFO
Top